Knockout of cyc2 in A. ferrooxidans to reduce sulfuric acid production in acid mine drainage

Design Brief

Kaitlyn Ramesh, Phil Shraybman, and Phoebe Shubin

BioBuilderClub, Needham High School, Needham, Massachusetts, USA

Reviewed on 8 May 2021; Accepted on 28 June 2021; Published on 25 October 2021
With help from the 2021 BioTreks Production Team.

AbstractVideoPDFCopyright
At sites of abandoned metal mines, water is polluted by dangerously high concentrations of sulfuric acid that corrode infrastructure and damage natural habitats, ultimately endangering aquatic life. This is due to the phenomenon of acid mine drainage (AMD), in which the sulfide minerals within metal ores are exposed to air and water, leading to formation of sulfuric acid in local bodies of water. Due to AMD, these nearby water supplies become polluted with high metal concentrations and develop a low pH. Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans is an acidophilic bacterium that thrives in abandoned metal mines. Its metabolic pathways play a major role in expediting sulfuric acid production through the oxidation of ferrous ions (Fe2+) to ferric ions (Fe3+). As part of its iron-oxidizing/O2-reducing supercomplex, A. ferrooxidans contains iron:rusticyanin reductase, an enzyme which catalyzes this ferrous-oxidizing reaction. By removing the cyc2 gene that encodes for this protein, we expect that A. ferrooxidans can survive as a species without contributing to the spread of AMD. In order to inactivate cyc2, we intend to use the gene knockout method developed by Datsenko and Wanner. However, it is unknown whether or not cyc2 knockout will prove cytotoxic, or whether the knockout bacteria would be able to continue to produce ferric ions via alternative pathways. Even if the cyc2 gene is removed, there may be little to no substantial change in the amount of sulfuric acid, since A. ferrooxidans is only one of many acidophiles that contribute to AMD. Nonetheless, we propose the knockout approach will disrupt the iron oxidation mechanism of A. ferrooxidans involved in AMD, while preserving its bacterial population.

Keywords: Acid mine, AMD, acidophile, gene knockout, sulfuric acidAcid mine, AMD, acidophile, gene knockout, sulfuric acid

Authors are listed in alphabetical order. Jennifer Regrut and Katherine Warfel mentored the group. Please direct all correspondence to jennifer_regrut@needham.k12.ma.us.

This is an Open Access article, which was copyrighted by the authors and published by BioTreks in 2021. It is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Background 

As the main source of water pollution within the mid-Atlantic region of the United States, acid mine drainage (AMD) is incredibly damaging to the environment. For example, AMD from the Berkeley Pit, a former copper mine, resulted in the deaths of over 4,000 migrating snow geese (Guarino, 2016). Acid mine drainage occurs when sulfides, common in most metal ores, are exposed to air and react with water to form sulfuric acid in bodies of water, reducing a neutral pH of 7 to values as low as 2. As a result, dangerously low pH (< 6.5) makes the water inhospitable to aquatic life, and can pollute the area further by dissolving harmful metalloids – such as Arsenic – that are present in the surrounding environment (Rambabu et al., 2020; University of Colorado Boulder, n.d.). AMD is particularly common in abandoned metal mines due to the presence of pyrite, also known as “fool’s gold,” which contains sulfide minerals (Abandoned Mine Drainage, n.d.). AMD treatment options, such as the addition of alkaline substances to neutralize acid, flooding mines, and relocation of waste, are expensive, with costs reaching hundreds of millions of dollars (What Can be Done, n.d.; Meagher, 2017). Hence, our team decided to address AMD through a method of bioremediation. Current approaches that utilize the bacteria that influence AMD include killing these bacteria, as well as offering them a more preferable source of energy. We looked into the chemical reactions associated with AMD to discern the impact of the surrounding bacteria. As seen below (Figure 1A), pyrite (Fe2S) can react with environmental water and oxygen to produce sulfuric acid (H2SO4). However, production of sulfuric acid is expedited by ferric ions (Fe3+), arising from oxidation of ferrous ions (Fe2+), since the former promote aqueous oxidation of pyrite, releasing 16 molar equivalents of hydrogen ions (H+). As shown in Figure 2B, one source of oxidation of ferrous ions is the acidophile, Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, through its enzyme iron:rusticyanin reductase, or Fe(II):rusticyanin oxidoreductase (Valdés et al., 2008; Brett & Banfield, 2003). Because of the drastic increase in H+ production that will accompany the resulting ferric ions, A. ferrooxidans bacteria undoubtedly contribute to the harmful effects of AMD in bodies of water. 

Systems level

By utilizing Datsenko and Wanner’s (2000) gene knockout method to inactivate the cyc2 gene of A. ferrooxidans, our team intends to delete the organism’s iron:rusticyanin reductase and disrupt the iron-oxidizing process (Caspi et al., 2013; The UniProt Consortium, 2020). Although this protocol has primarily been used on E. coli (Datsenko & Wanner, 2000), recent research regarding A. ferrooxidans – particularly the complete sequencing of its genome and engineering of strains that overexpress the membrane protein rusticyanin – will aid in application of the gene knockout method (Liu et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2019). As depicted in Figure 2, we will first replace the cyc2 gene with an ampicillin resistance gene enabling selection of clones with the target gene successfully removed. A second transformation with FLP recombinase will delete the ampicillin resistance gene, producing a strain of A. ferrooxidans without its cyc2 gene, therefore rendering its iron-oxidizing pathway useless. 

Device level

The fundamental components of the design (Figure 2) are made up of the genetically modified A. ferrooxidans bacteria and its modified iron oxidizing metabolic pathway, lacking the iron:rusticyanin reductase enzyme. 

When the level of the iron:rusticyanin reductase enzyme present in the bacteria is reduced, the production of Fe3+ by the iron-oxidizing metabolic pathway should decrease, leading to a reduction in sulfuric acid production and the chemical processes involved in AMD. To achieve this aim, we selected FLP recombinase proteins, expressed by a helper plasmid, to delete the targeted region of the genome.

Parts level

Since the cyc2 gene codes for the iron:rusticyanin reductase enzyme, the gene knockout method will be applied to this gene (The UniProt Consortium, 2020), using the process illustrated in Figure 3. To apply the gene knockout method, PCR will be used to create an ampicillin resistance gene containing flanking FRT (FLP recognition target) sites, and 36-nt DNA homology regions (H1 and H2), at each of its ends. H1 and H2 will be homologous to the DNA flanking the cyc2 gene on A. ferrooxidans to mark where the recombination should occur (Datsenko & Wanner, 2000). 

By transforming the bacteria with a lambda red recombineering plasmid, the ampicillin resistance gene, and the DNA from A. ferrooxidans including the homologies, the plasmid will replace the cyc2 gene with the ampicillin resistance gene; the success of this replacement can be checked by streaking the bacterial colonies onto solid media containing ampicillin. Finally, ampicillin resistant clones will be transformed with FLP recombinase, which will recognize the FRT sites and “knock out” the ampicillin resistance gene, ultimately leading to an A. ferrooxidans genome lacking its cyc2 gene. 

Safety

The exact methods and safety specifications of enacting the mechanism outlined in this design brief are currently uncertain. Given that the outlined design affects bacteria that may end up in various bodies of water, it is essential that, before implementation into the proposed environment, there is rigorous safety testing of modified bacteria in a controlled setting. While the proposed mechanism is intended only to stop production of the ferric ions involved in AMD, any potential unintended effects caused by the genetically modified bacteria will have to be closely monitored in experimental trials. Prior to disposal after safety trials, the modified bacteria should be treated with chlorine. Further considerations may include potential adverse effects caused by the modified bacteria to workers in operational metal mines; however, this design brief’s intended focus is primarily on abandoned metal mines.  

Discussion

The proposed system would reduce the amount of ferric ions produced by A. ferrooxidans, and therefore limit the production of sulfuric acid. This would decrease the acidity of the affected water and substantially lessen the impact of AMD on freshwater ecosystems. By modifying an organism that already exists in the environment, A. ferrooxidans, the risk of introducing an entirely new organism to the ecosystem is removed. This reduces the chance of unexpected consequences. A. ferrooxidans is also a highly-researched species, and one of the most well-known acidophiles, making it an ideal subject for such an experiment. However, the knockout method of gene removal has not previously been used on A. ferrooxidans, so it is unknown if the method will be effective. It is also possible that the removal of the cyc2 gene will result in death of the bacteria, or make the bacteria less fit within the acidic environment, perhaps leading the species to disappear from AMD-affected sites completely. In order to effectively limit sulfuric acid production, the majority of the A. ferrooxidans bacteria within the ecosystem would have to lack the cyc2 gene. For this to occur, the engineered bacteria that are introduced into the population would have to outcompete, or grow at a faster rate than, the existing A. ferrooxidans bacteria. 

As cyc2 codes for the single iron:rusticyanin reductase enzyme, it is also possible that its removal will not significantly impact the organism’s larger iron-oxidizing enzyme complex. The complex may be able to function without the iron:rusticyanin reductase enzyme, which would mean additional genes would have to be knocked out from the bacteria to achieve the desired goal. Additionally, even if the knockout method were fully successful and A. ferrooxidans no longer produced ferric ions, the level of impact this would have on AMD is unknown. Lastly, since sulfide minerals naturally react with water and oxygen to form sulfuric acid, it is possible that engineered strains of A. ferrooxidans might not counter the effects of acid mine drainage to an extent sufficient to clean up bodies of water. In that case, it may be necessary to also target the chemical processes that can consume sulfide minerals or free-moving H+ ions, to prevent any increase in acidity using strategies other than eliminating the microbial iron-oxidation step of AMD. 

Next steps 

The first step in developing the proposed system would be to test the effectiveness of the gene knockout method on A. ferrooxidans. If the knockout method is not effective on A. ferrooxidans, a new method of gene modification would need to be selected. To test the effectiveness of the gene knockout method, a controlled environment, replicating the factors in an abandoned metal mine that contribute to AMD, would have to be created. The rate at which a control group of unaltered A. ferrooxidans expedites sulfuric acid production within this model environment would need to be tested; these results should be compared to the rate at which the modified A. ferrooxidans bacteria (the test group) expedites sulfuric acid production within the model. If the test group does not have a different rate of sulfuric acid production from the control, it is likely that the knockout approach was not effective. 

If the gene knockout method is effective at reducing sulfuric acid production in AMD by a statistically significant margin, the next steps for further research would involve creating a method by which the engineered A. ferrooxidans bacteria could outcompete existing bacteria, or outgrow the wild type strain until the engineered bacteria are dominant in the ecosystem. This potential design would enable the engineered A. ferrooxidans bacteria to be applied on a large scale, and be used as a self-sustaining long-term solution for AMD. Since the various experiments mentioned above may involve more advanced testing and equipment than found in high school biology laboratories, a collaboration between the BioBuilder group and a college or biotech company may be necessary. 

Author contributions

P.L.S. drew the graphics and figures; and identified several methods of addressing the issue of acid mine drainage, helping narrow down the focus to A. ferrooxidans. K.R. researched the chemical pathways involved in sulfuric acid production, identified the role of A. ferrooxidans in producing sulfuric acid, and located the cyc2 gene that codes for iron:rusticyanin reductase. P.E.S. identified the experiments needed to support the design, and proposed next steps for further application of the engineered bacteria. All authors researched the steps necessary to effectively apply gene knockout in A. ferrooxidans. 

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank our club advisor, Jennifer Regrut, for guiding us throughout our research process, and for helping us refine our ideas. We would also like to give a special thank you to our mentor, Katherine Warfel, for providing relevant industry knowledge and resources to help us achieve our project goals. Finally, we would like to thank the BioBuilder Educational Foundation for providing us with the opportunity to invest in our synthetic biology interests. 

References 

Abandoned mine drainage. (n.d.). United States Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/nps/abandoned-mine-drainage 

Brett, B. J., & Banfield, J. F. (2003). Microbial communities in acid mine drainage. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 44(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00028-X

Caspi, R., Altman, T., Billington, R., Dreher, K., Foerster, H., Fulcher, C. A., Holland, T. A., Keseler, I. M., Kothari, A., Kubo, A., Krummenacker, M., Latendresse, M., Mueller, L. A., Ong, Q., Paley, S., Subhraveti, P., Weaver, D. S., Weerasinghe, D., Zhang, P., & Karp, P. D. (2014). The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of Pathway/Genome Databases. Nucleic Acids Research, 42(D1), D459–D471. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1103 

Datsenko, K. A., & Wanner, B. L. (2000). One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(12), 6640–6645. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.120163297 

Guarino, B. (2016, December 7). Thousands of Montana snow geese die after landing in toxic, acidic mine pit. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/12/07/montana-snow-geese-searching-for-pond-land-in-toxic-mine-pit-thousands-die/

Liu, W., Lin, J., Pang, X., Cui, S., Mi, S., & Lin, J. (2011). Overexpression of rusticyanin in Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans ATCC19859 increased Fe(II) oxidation activity. Current Microbiology, 62, 320–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-010-9708-0 

Meagher, M. (2017, September 6). Acid mine drainage: The potential for economic and environmental disaster. Future Directions International. https://www.futuredirections.org.au/publication/acid-mine-drainage-potential-economic-environmental-disaster/

Rambabu, K., Banat, F., Pham, Q. M., Ho, S.-H., Ren, N.-Q., & Show, P. L. (2020). Biological remediation of acid mine drainage: Review of past trends and current outlook. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 2, Article 100024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2020.100024 

The UniProt Consortium. (2020). UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2021. Nucleic Acids Research, 49(D1), D480–D489. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa1100

University of Colorado Boulder. (n.d.). Acid mine/rock drainage. Center for Water, Earth Science and Technology. https://wayback.archive-it.org/12313/20210527164620/https://www.colorado.edu/cwest/research/research-themes/water-and-environmental-quality/acid-minerock-drainage 

Valdés, J., Pedroso, I., Quatrini, R., Dodson, R. J., Tettelin, H., Blake II, R., Eisen, J. A., & Holmes, D. S. (2008). Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans metabolism: from genome sequence to industrial applications. BMC Genomics, 9, Article 597. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-597

What can be done to prevent or clean up acid mine drainage? (n.d.). American Geosciences Institute. https://www.americangeosciences.org/critical-issues/faq/what-can-be-done-prevent-or-clean-acid-mine-drainage

Zhang, Y., Zhang, S., Zhao, D., Ni, Y., Wang, W., & Yan, L. (2020). Complete genome sequence of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans YNTRS-40, a strain of the ferrous iron- and sulfur-oxidizing acidophile. Microorganisms, 8(1), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8010002