The application of endophytic bacteria Methylobacterium radiotolerans to protect a strain of rice from potential fungal or bacterial infection

Design Brief

Shiyang Gong1, Maximus Keller1, and Jinhui Wang1

1Western Reserve Academy, Hudson, Ohio, United States; 2Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, United States

Reviewed on 7 May 2022; Accepted on 25 June 2022; Published on 15 October 2022

With help from the 2022 BioTreks Production Team.

AbstractBadgesVideoPDFCopyright

The world consumed over 504 million metric tons of rice in 2020. Rice is an essential part of many people’s diet, and its large quantity and low price make it a necessity for those in developing countries. However, bacterial and fungal infections severely damage the production of this vital crop. Our team proposes the usage of endophytes, which are symbiotic, non-pathogenic bacteria in between the cell walls of plants, to fight diseases. We plan to insert various anti-microbial genes, such as antifungals, chitinase and beta-1 3-glucanase, and anti-bacterial gene anti-Xoo Xa4, into the specific endophyte Methylobacterium radiotolerans. By inserting one plasmid that encodes anti-fungal and anti-microbial genes into M. radiotolerans, an endophyte that transfers from the parent to the offspring via seeds, the endophyte would able be to combat various pathogens and thus protect the crop after transforming into the plant. In the first stage, we plan to practice a prototypical in vivo experiment with Escherichia coli and examine whether the endophyte produces the desired antibacterials and antifungals with SDS-PAGE. Then, we will transform the plasmid into M. radiotolerans, insert the endophyte into the rice plant, and expose the rice plant to bacterial blight and rice blast in another in vivo experiment. Lastly, we will grow the rice seeds and examine whether the endophyte and gene expression continues to exist in the offspring. Our project aims to increase crop yields by limiting disease and aiding in feeding the expanding population worldwide.

Keywords: Oryza sativa, Methylobacterium radiotolerans, vertical transmission, chitinase, Xa4

Authors are listed in alphabetical order. Beth Pethel1, and Kosuke Seki2 mentored the group. Please direct all correspondence to gongs23@wra.net, wangj23@wra.net, kellerm22@wra.net, and pethelb@wra.net.

This is an Open Access article, which was copyrighted by the authors and published by BioTreks in 2022. It is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Background 

Rice (Oryza sativa) is a staple food that grows globally and feeds more than half the world’s population. According to projections, rice will remain a staple food source with a growing population (Fukagawa & Ziska, 2019). The importance of rice extends beyond providing a stable source of carbohydrates and fibers. Costing 71 cents per pound in 2019, rice is an affordable part of a meal for many families (Shahbandeh, 2021). Historically, changes in rice availability have led to social unrest, such as the food crisis of 2008, where rice cost tripled and pushed an estimated 100 million people below the poverty line, which is $1.90 a day. Therefore, rice is a fundamental and irreplaceable crop in many countries. 

Various fungal, bacterial, or nematode infections threaten this vital crop (see table 1). Common rice diseases include rice blast caused by Magnaporthe oryzae, rice bacterial blight caused by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae, root-knot caused by the nematode Meloidogyne graminicola, rice white tip caused by the nematode Aphelenchoides besseyi, and ufra disease caused by Ditylenchus angustus (Liu & Wang, 2016). These pathogens cause significant crop loss every year. For instance, rice blast is responsible for over 30% of rice production loss worldwide (Liu & Wang, 2016; Nalley et al., 2016). M. oryzae is a fungus that infects the entire rice crop, resulting in the most significant damage when it infects the base of the stem, or the panicle, which is the cluster of flowers (Nalley et al., 2016). The damage caused by different pathogens varies. For example, rice bacterial blight caused by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae invade the xylem vessels, which are water-conducting vessels in plant, thus causing rots on rice leaves such like the ones shown in Figure 1 (Liu & Wang, 2016). 

Figure 1. Rice blight on the stem of a rice plant. Donald Groth, Louisiana State University AgCenter, Bugwood.org

Table 1.  Summary of common rice diseases and pathogens 

NamePathogen TypeDiseaseInfected Region
Magnaporthe griseaFungiBlastleaf, neck, nodal
Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzaeBacteriaBacterial blightleaf
Ditylenchus angustusNematodeUfra Diseasestem
Pseudomonas fuscovaginaeBacteriaBrown Sheath rotsheath
Burkholderia glumaeBacteriaGrain rotseed
Fusarium proliferatumFungiRoot rotroot
Aphelenchoides besseyiNematodeRice White Tipleaf
Gaeumannomyces graminisFungiCrown Sheath Rotsheath
Meloidogyne graminicolaNematodeRice root knotroot
Ceratobasidium oryzae-sativaeFungiAggregate Sheathsheath

The conventional measures used to prevent bacterial rice blight are ineffective and demanding. These treatments include: using a balanced amount of nutrients, especially nitrogen, ensuring good drainage of fields, and keeping fields clean, which includes removing weeds and plowing under rice stubble and more, which can serve as hosts for bacteria. Fallow fields are plowed but left unsown to restore soil fertility and left to dry in order to suppress disease agents in the soil and plant residues (Bacterial Blight, n.d.). The most common solution for bacterial blast is the use of fungicides. Unfortunately, fungicides are harmful to aquatic organisms—especially microorganisms and invertebrates—which are rudimentary components of the aquatic food chain (Zubrod et al., 2019). Since fungicide exposure in water is common, its malevolence towards water organisms makes it unfriendly to the environment (Zubrod et al., 2019). Furthermore, fungicides are expensive, costing over $70 per 10,000 square meters on average (Nalley et al., 2016). The intensive use of chemicals to control rice blast can result in blast pathogens gaining resistance to the antibiotic compounds and organophosphorus fungicides (Nalley et al., 2016). Another solution is genetically modified rice strains that are specifically immune to specific pathogens (Nalley et al., 2016). Although genetically modified seeds are commercially available worldwide, they are expensive to most consumers: genetically engineered strains cost over $237.12 per hectare (Nalley et al., 2016). 

Our solution inexpensively combats the previously mentioned pathogens by genetically engineering vertically transmitted endophytes to produce antifungals and antibacterials. Endophytes are symbiotic microorganisms dwelling between plant cells (Gouda et al., 2016). These microbes release compounds with various enhancive abilities, including improving the plant’s growth rate or combating foreign pathogens, and thus are beneficial to the plant’s overall well-being (Gouda et al., 2016). Inhabiting various regions of a plant, endophytes can be fungi or bacteria (Gouda et al., 2016). Their wide range of habitats within the plant and their ability to release bioactive antimicrobial or antifungal compounds make them a prime candidate for use against plant pathogens (Gouda et al., 2016). The transmission of endophytes can be both horizontal and vertical. Horizontal transmission is between two nearby yet non-related plants via soil, and vertical transmission is the transmission between the parent plant and its offspring via seeds or pollen (Frank et al., 2017). Endophytes that vertically transmit do so naturally by inhibiting the seeds or pollen of their host plant (Frank et al., 2017). Due to this ability, our design does not involve a seed coating, as endophytes live within the host plant.  In our design, we use the vertically transmitted bacterial endophyte M. radiotolerans because it inhabits the entire plant, including the seeds, which allows it to target pathogens invading different regions of the plant and pass down genes through generations (Kaga et al., 2009). 

Our design proposes the insertion of antimicrobial-producing genes into M. radiotolerans through plasmids. This design would enable M. radiotolerans to combat pathogenic fungus and bacteria. The project incorporates a category of antifungals called lytic enzymes, which hydrolyze or break down a specific component of the microbial cell wall (Kobayashi et al., 2002; Tian et al., 2007). Chitinase binds with and hydrolyzes chitin, a polysaccharide and constituent of the cell wall of M. oryzae, resulting in cell death (Kobayashi et al., 2002). We retrieved the chitinase gene sequence from Strenotropho maltophilia, an endophytic bacterium that secretes chitinase to suppress rice blast fungus M. oryzae (Etesami & Alikhani, 2016; Kobayashi et al., 2002;). ß-1 3-glucanase has a similar antifungal mechanism as chitinase, except it targets ß-1 3-glucan of M. oryzae (Mouyna et al., 2013). Studies reveal that ß-1 3-glucanase can successfully regulate the growth of the pathogen Fusarium, including Fusarium proliferatum. This pathogen causes rice spikelet rot disease, a panicle disease that leads to rice grain rot ( Lei et al. 2019; Ueki et al., 2020;). We retrieved the ß-1 3-glucanase gene from Streptomyces sioyaensis, an endophyte that regulates the growth of Fusarium oxysporum (Hong et al., 2002). The inclusion of two antifungals provides M. radiotolerans with the ability to combat most pathogenic fungi and thus increase the rice strain’s resistance toward these fungus..

Our design includes the addition of the anti-Xoo gene Xa4 to enhance resistance to bacterial infections, such as rice blight caused by X. oryzae pv. oryzae, or Xoo. Xa4 gene commonly exists in rice crops in China, and it encodes a kinase that promotes cell wall synthesis of rice crops and thus enhances the cell wall’s durability and renewability (Hu et al., 2017). This kinase prevents Xoo from creating white and milky lesions on rice leaves that lead to the leaf’s death ( Grant, 2021; Hu et al., 2017). Since Xoo infects the surface wounds of plants, enhancing cell wall durability and renewability reduces Xoo infection likelihood (Hu et al., 2017). Moreover, Xa4 improves the secretion and production of sakuranetin and momilactone A, antimicrobials that combat foreign infection (Hu et al., 2017). Our construct includes pairing the anti-fungal chitinase and Xa4 within the endophyte M. radiotolerans to provide immunity against fungal rice rot and bacterial blight. If the design is successful, the endophyte can become a sustainable possibility of securing rice production worldwide.

The insertion of multiple antimicrobials within M. radiotolerans would result in endophytes that can combat various pathogens and vertically transmit the antimicrobials through the rice strain to ensure herd immunity against these diseases. We plan to use promoters that only synthesize the anti-microbial genes after pathogens are introduced to the plant to prevent excessive production of antimicrobials that would unnecessarily harm the plant’s microbiome. The promoters we selected also help reduce the effect on the environment as there should be no production of antimicrobials in the event M. radiotolerans migrates outside of the host plant and would act as it would naturally. Since our project utilizes endophytes to combat diseases and pass resistant genes into future generations of rice, it provides consumers with a sustainable and cheap method to defend rice and similar crops. Moreover, as it does not involve the direct modification of the plant genome, it would not violate any GMO regulation, thus making it a usable and safe method.

Systems Level

Our design, as described in Figure 2,  involves the insertion of endophyte M. radiotolerans into rice plants. M. radiotolerans exists in most parts of the plant, including the seeds, which enables it to vertically transform from one generation to the next (Kaga et al., 2009). However, since M. radiotolerans has no records of successful transformation, we would first use Escherichia coli to examine the antimicrobial activity of our selected genes. We would insert chitin and OSSWEET14 as promoters into the plasmid. Chitin, a material found in most fungus’s cell walls, would activate anti-fungal promoter pChiIV3, which then triggers the synthesis of chitinase and β-1 3-glucanase. We would transform the plasmid into E. coli via heat shock, and then examine the presence of the desired proteins, which includes chitinase, β-1 3-glucanase, and cell-wall associated kinase. Protein purification and SDS-PAGE are used to detect the presence of these antimicrobial proteins (see Figure 2) 

Figure 2: Graphic description of the first stage and the second stage experiment

Once this experiment proves the effectiveness of the plasmid, we will transform the plasmid into M. radiotolerans via electroporation. We will then transfer the M. radiotolerans into the rice plant. Due to endophytes’ ability to transfer horizontally from the soil to the roots of the plant, inserting M. radiotolerans into the soil enables it to enter the rice roots, and thus transfers into the rest of the crop. Since M. radiotolerans naturally exist within the soil, it would not post any harm to the environment after the insertion. We would then practice an in vivo experiment where we infect the plant with rice blast fungi Magnaporthe grisea and rice blight bacteria X. oryzae pv. oryzae. We would then assess the antifungal activity of the inoculated M. radiotolerans with a modified dinitrosalicylate method, which measures the reduction in chitin and β-1 3-glucan in the infected region. A positive outcome of the in vivo experiment would prove that the inoculation of an endophyte containing a plasmid with anti-microbial genes would defend the rice plant from pathogenic infections(see Figure 2). 

To further analyze the vertical transformation from the rice plant to the next generation, the seeds of the rice plant would be planted, and another in vivo experiment would be performed on the next generation to determine the presence of the plant in the offspring. If antimicrobial activity similar to that expressed in the previous generation is present in the infected region, then the inoculated M. radiotolerans has vertically transformed between generations. It also means that M. radiotolerans will remain present and active in the entire strain of rice, hence proving that this system would provide immunity against specific pathogens to the entire strain of rice.

Device Level

The plasmid design contains the Chitinase A gene, ß-1 3-glucanase gene, anti-bacterial gene XA4, chitinase-driven promoter pChiIV3 transcription activator like effector (TALE) or promoter, the green fluorescent protein, and an ampicillin resistance gene. The chitinase-driven promoter pChiIV3 promotes the Chitinase A gene and ß-1 3-glucanase gene, while the transcription activator-like effector (TALE) or promoter promotes the anti-bacterial gene XA4. The green fluorescent protein acts as a marker protein for the Chitinase A gene, ß-1 3-glucanase gene, and the anti-bacterial gene XA4, which enables visual recognition when the three selected genes are expressed. 

Parts Level

Chitinase A gene, ß-1 3-glucanase gene, antibacterial gene XA4, chitinase-driven promoter pChiIV3, and transcription activator like (Tal) effector or promoter will be assembled onto expression vector backbone pTE100. As a derivative of IncP plasmid pDN19 in Methylobacterium extorquens AM1, pCM80 is an expression vector that exhibits high-level gene expression (Mark & Lidstrom, 2001). Due to its identity as an IncP plasmid found in M. extorquens AM1, a well-researched methylotroph that belongs to the same genus as M. radiotolerans, pCM80 demonstrates high-level gene expression in other methylotrophs, including M. radiotolerans, as well as other gram-negative bacteria such as E. coli (Mark & Lidstrom, 2001). This broad-host range and high-level gene expression makes pCM80 the most ideal backbone of our plasmid in the first experiment with E. coli and the further experiment with M. radiotolerans. However, pCM80 includes an existing promoter mxaF and lacks a multiple cloning site, which restricts us from freely inserting our parts into the vector (Mark & Lidstrom, 2001; Schada von borzyskowski et al., 2014). Thus, instead of directly utilizing pCM80, we will use the brick vector pTE100: a modified vector of pCM80 that removes the existing primers and inserts a multiple cloning site (Schada von borzyskowski et al., 2014). We retrieve the gene sequence of the backbone from Addgene with catalog number 59395 (Schada von borzyskowski et al., 2014).  The pTE100 also includes a tetracycline resistance gene tetA, which makes it a selectable marker during transformation (Schada von borzyskowski et al., 2014). Bacteria, after the transformation, would grow on agar containing tetracycline, which would provide colonies with only the bacteria containing the plasmid after the transformation.  

Both chitinase and ß-1 3-glucanase are glycosyl hydrolases that hydrolyze common carbohydrates constituting fungal cell walls (Tian et al., 2007; Kobayashi et al., 2002). Chitinase catalyzes the hydrolysis of chitin, and ß-1 3-glucanase catalyzes the hydrolysis of ß-1 3-glucan (Mouyna et al., 2013). These enzymes’ hydrolytic activity inhibits the spore germination of various pathogenic fungi in plants and, therefore, efficiently reduces the proliferation of the pathogen within the plants (Chernin et al., 1997). In our design, we incorporated a specific chitinase gene ChiA. Kobayashi et al.(2002) discovered this gene in gram-negative bacteria S. maltophilia, an endophytic bacterium that displays chitinolytic activity on various fungal pathogens. We retrieved ß-1 3-glucanase from S. sioyaensis, another endophytic bacterium that represses the proliferation of fungal pathogen Fusarium Oxyporum through the hydrolysis of the fungal cell wall (Hong et al., 2002). We retrieve the S. maltophilia chitinase A gene ChiA from GenBank with access number AF014950, and S. sioyaensis endo ß-1 3-glucanase gene from GenBank access number  AF217415 (Hong et al., 2002; Kobayashi et al., 2002).

To combat bacterial infections such as X. oryzae pv. oryzae, we included the anti-bacterial gene XA4. As a gene commonly found in mutated rice crops, XA4 synthesizes a cell wall-associated kinase that enhances the production of cellulose and thus increases the rigidness of the plant cell wall (Hu et al., 2017). This mechanism improves the rice’s resistance to various bacterial pathogens, including rice blight pathogen X. oryzae pv. Oryzae (Hu et al., 2017). Although the specific mechanism in which the cell wall-associated kinase enhances the cell wall rigidness remains unknown, researches show that the presence of XA4 correlates with the induction of cellulose-producing gene CesA expression, thereby improving the overall cellulose level in the rice plants’ cell walls (Hu et al., 2017). Moreover, XA4 enhances the secretion and production of sakuranetin and momilactone A, which are both phytoalexins that have records of suppressing rice bacterial blight pathogen X. oryzae pv. oryzae (Hu et al., 2017). Therefore, inserting XA4 into the endophyte enables M. radiotolerans to facilitate the resistance to bacterial pathogens. We obtain the gene sequence of XA4 with GenBank access number KU761305 (Hu et al. 2017). 

To prevent the overproduction of antimicrobials that potentially undermines the overall health of M. radiotolerans or the rice plant, the synthesis of antimicrobials should only start after the first exposure to the disease. To achieve this goal, we selected primers sensitive to the components of the pathogens. Chitin-driven promoter pChiIV3 is a promoter found in pepper plants that initiates the synthesis of pepper chitinase gene ChiIV after exposure to fungal pathogens (Liu et al., 2017). As formerly mentioned, chitin is a common constituent of fungal plant cells, therefore, the exposure of chitin to fungal pathogens would activate the synthesis of the anti-microbial gene (Liu et al., 2017). As shown in Figure 3, by inserting pCHiIV3 before all the antimicrobial genes , our device would only start the synthesis of the anti-microbial after the first exposure to the fungal pathogens. 

Transcription activator-like effectors (TALEs) are effectors released by bacterial pathogens that bind to specific regions of the host gene and lead to gene induction of the host gene sequence (Blanvillain-Baufumé et al., 2016). According to Blanvillain-Baufumé’s study, OsSWEET14 is a common target of various TALEs of X. oryzae pv. oryzae, acting as a promoter of gene synthesis (2016). After the effectors bind with OsSWEET14, the effector would synthesize the following gene sequence (Blanvillain-Baufumé et al., 2016). Shown by Figure 3, inserting OsSWEEt14 into the vector and before the XA4 gene would allow the synthesis of the anti-microbial gene XA4 to only initiate during the exposure of X. oryzae pv. oryzae. 

Figure 3: Graphic description of the plasmid function and mechanism. pChiIV3 and OsSWEET14 would individually initiate the synthesis of the antimicrobials based on the type of pathogen that caused the infection.

We will insert S. maltophilia, chitinase A gene chiA, S. sioyaensis endo ß-1 3-glucanase gene, and anti-bacterial gene XA4 into the pTE100 backbone to construct our plasmid. By inserting these specific gene sequences into the pTE100 brick vector, we will create a plasmid that accommodates E. coli and M. radiotolerans, thus usable in both the first and the second stages(see Figure 4)

Figure 4: An overview of the plasmid design. All of the described genes, promoters and terminators are inserted on the plasmid backbone pTE100. The tetracycline resistance, which is the selective marker already included in the plasmid.

Safety

There is a concern about the development of antibiotic resistance. When exposing any form of life to an antibiotic, antibiotic exposure places selective pressure on organisms to develop resistance. From a study done by Harvard, bacteria was able to travel from agar with 0 levels of antibiotics to agar with 1000x the original concentration in 11 days. This means that in 11 days, the bacteria were able to develop 1000x resistance (Pesheva, 2016). With our bacteria producing antibiotics, there will always be selective pressure for resistance. For this reason, we designed our bacteria to only produce antibiotics when necessary. We will use our promoters, which only activate once they have sensed chemicals produced by pathogens to achieve this. Although adding a restriction to antibiotic production will not remove the issue of antibiotic resistance, it prevents the over saturation of antibiotics in the host plant giving bacteria and fungus a smaller chance to develop resistance.

Another concern is how the XA4 gene enhances cell walls. We are unaware of how this gene may affect the taste or texture of rice. It is possible that the added strength to the cell walls of the rice seed may require more time to cook to soften the rice. Another factor that we are unsure of is how the gene will affect rice production. A study on XA4’s effects on plants concluded that plants under its effects would not grow as tall, but seed production would not be affected; hence, the likelihood of XA4 causing major environmental effects remains low. The plant’s overall structure, however, will be changed because there will be less cellulose present, and the plant will be more brittle (Römer et al., 2009). A brittle plant may impact crop production in an unforeseen way.

Finally, with our antifungals targeting chitin, a common component of fungal cell walls, there is always the chance they may impact other fungi important to the rice plant’s own microbiome. However, since the production is only activated when the plant is exposed to a major fungal infection, the possibility of which endophyte leads to the death of symbiotic fungus is low. 

Discussions

We chose to use endophytes as a carrier to express the anti-bacterial and anti-fungal genes because, in their natural habitats, endophytes are nonpathogenic, symbiotic microorganisms dwelling between plant cells that are suited to improve plant growth and immunity (Gouda et al., 2016). We chose to use the bacterial endophyte M. radiotolerans to insert the plasmid-containing genes that prevent rice blight and rice blast. M. radiotolerans naturally exists in soil, on leaves, and in other parts of rice plants, allowing the plasmid it carries to target pathogens invading different regions of the rice plant. For these reasons, we selected M. radiotolerans (Kaga et al., 2019). By using bacterial endophyte M. radiotolerans in our design, we minimize the risks of the rice plant rejecting the insertion of foreign genes and maximize the effectiveness of the expression of the plasmids. 

One major advantage of this design is the utilization of the unique properties of endophytes. Endophytes are harmless and can transmit vertically, enabling transmission between the parent plant and its offspring via seeds or pollen. By living and passing down the desired genes to their offspring, endophytes can provide immunity to future generations of rice plants with the designed insertion of specific disease-resistant genes. Compared to conventional treatments such as fungicides or genetically modified seeds, the endophyte design provides consumers with a more sustainable and less arduous method of protecting rice plants.

There are a few potential challenges, however, regarding the implementation and experimentation of the endophyte design. The foremost challenge is to control the rest of the variables to gather reliable data on the effects of the anti-bacterial and anti-fungal genes on the rice plant. Rice plants naturally have defense mechanisms and innate and adaptive immunity, and certain rice strains have different immunities to diseases than other strands. We must find a rice strain that hadn’t previously been exposed to rice blast and rice blight, so the strand does not have any natural defenses against the two diseases, or else we cannot conclude whether it was the genes present in M. radiotolerans that fought off the diseases or just the rice strand’s natural defenses. There is also concern regarding the anti-bacterial gene’s effects on the M. radiotolerans bacteria’s survival after being expressed as well. While the Xa4 gene only promotes the growth of cell walls to prevent diseases from invading the rice plants through incisions, the introduction of other bacteriocide such as penicillin may inhibit the survival of M. radiotolerans bacteria carrying the plasmid, which would limit the production of the anti-bacterial and anti-fungal genes and produce a less ideal result. While the safer approach can eliminate the anti-bacterial genes like penicillin from the bacterial plasmid, our design goal is to experiment with the endophytes’ ability to act as a carrier of plasmids with foreign genes. Therefore, we included more than one anti-fungal gene. The final concern is that the Xa4 gene has an abnormally long length that may create issues for RNA Polymerase to read and express the entirety of the gene sequence correctly.

We plan to test and see whether or not our bacteria will naturally release our proteins. However, if this fails, we will insert the YepF gene into the plasmid. YepF is a carrier protein naturally produced by E. coli (Zhang et. al., 2006) Although its main function remains unknown, the sec-leader of this protein is a carrier protein that enables the protein to transfer between cell membranes (Zhang et al., 2006). With the YepF gene, the produced antimicrobials can move outside the cell membrane of the endophyte and combat the pathogens outside the plant.  

Next Steps  

If the plasmid inside the endophyte M. radiotolerans successfully expresses its inserted genes and can provide a certain degree of immunity to the rice plant, then we can prove that endophytes are a plausible carrier of foreign genes to be used in the rice plant. Should the previous statement be true, there might be the possibility that endophytes yield similar results in other plants. Therefore, as rice and other plant pathogens evolve and develop a resistance to chemicals, we can insert novel disease-resistant genes through plasmids into M. radiotolerans to combat the new diseases. Then, the future applications of the endophyte design can range from any plant that needs prevention against diseases without using pesticides, herbicides, or gene modification. Another area of further study could be into other crops in the field of agriculture; since modern agriculture relies heavily on monoculture and high yield, there is increased susceptibility to diseases caused by the loss of biodiversity. Endophytes would act as a carrier of plasmids with genes that provide crops with immunity to specific pathogens. 

Author Contributions

M.K. is the founder of the Endophyte project. He recorded voice over for the video. He researched and discovered the most suitable endophyte, and designed the plasmid. J.G. is responsible for all the art and graphics of the websites and the graphs in the paper, and also the animation for the videos. He researched the anti-fungal genes that will be inserted into the plasmid. H.W. researched the anti-bacterial gene to be inserted into the plasmid. He is the organizer and editor of the entire project.

Acknowledgements

We like to acknowledge the continuous support from Beth Pethel and Kosuke Seki as our mentors that guided us through our project. 

This project was accomplished through participation in the Synthetic Biology, a full-year course  that immerses students in the cutting edge convergence of biology, engineering, and invention known as synthetic biology. Through an iterative process, students research issues, genes, and various organisms to create a novel genetically engineered machine to address a challenge of their choice.

References 

Bacterial blight [Fact sheet]. (n.d.). IRRI Rice Knowledge Bank. Retrieved August 25, 2022, from http://www.knowledgebank.irri.org/decision-tools/rice-doctor/rice-doctor-fact-sheets/item/bacterial-blight 

Blanvillain-baufumé, S., Reschke, M., Solé, M., Auguy, F., Doucoure, H., Szurek, B., Meynard, D., Portefaix, M., Cunnac, S., Guiderdoni, E., Boch, J., & Koebnik, R. (2016). Targeted promoter editing for rice resistance to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae reveals differential activities for SWEET14-inducing TAL effectors. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 15(3), 306-317. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12613 

Chernin, L. S., De la Fuente, L., Sobolev, V., Haran, S., Vorgias, C. E., Oppenheim, A. B., & Chet, I. (1997). Molecular cloning, structural analysis, and expression in Escherichia coli of a chitinase gene from Enterobacter agglomerans. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 63(3), 834-839. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.63.3.834-839.1997 

Etesami, H., & Alikhani, H. A. (2016). Suppression of the fungal pathogen Magnaporthe grisea by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, a seed-borne rice (Oryza sativa) endophytic bacterium. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 62(9), 1271-1284. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2016.1139087 

Frank, A., Saldierna guzmán, J., & Shay, J. (2017). Transmission of bacterial endophytes. Microorganisms, 5(4), 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms5040070 

Fukagawa, N. K., & Ziska, L. H. (2019). Rice: Importance for global nutrition. Journal of Nutritional Science and Vitaminology, 65(Supplement), S2-S3. https://doi.org/10.3177/jnsv.65.S2 

Gouda, S., Das, G., Sen, S. K., Shin, H.-S., & Patra, J. K. (2016). Endophytes: A treasure house of bioactive compounds of medicinal importance. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01538 

Grant, A. (2021, October 3). Rice bacterial leaf blight control: Treating rice with bacterial leaf blight disease. Gardening Know How. Retrieved December 10, 2021, from https://www.gardeningknowhow.com/edible/grains/rice/rice-with-bacterial-leaf-blight-disease.htm 

Hong, T.-Y., Cheng, C.-W., Huang, J.-W., & Meng, M. (2002). Isolation and biochemical characterization of an endo-1,3-β-glucanase from Streptomyces sioyaensis containing a c-terminal family 6 carbohydrate-binding module that binds to 1,3-β-glucan the genbank accession number for the sequence reported in this paper is af21741. Microbiology, 148(4). https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-148-4-1151 

Hu, K., Cao, J., Zhang, J., Xia, F., Ke, Y., Zhang, H., Xie, W., Liu, H., Cui, Y., Cao, Y., Sun, X., Xiao, J., Li, X., Zhang, Q., & Wang, S. (2017). Improvement of multiple agronomic traits by a disease resistance gene via cell wall reinforcement. Nature Plants, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2017.9 

Kaga, H., Mano, H., Tanaka, F., Watanabe, A., Kaneko, S., & Morisaki, H. (2009). Rice seeds as sources of endophytic bacteria. Microbes and Environments, 24(2), 154-162. https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.me09113 

Kobayashi, D. Y., Reedy, R. M., Bick, J., & Oudemans, P. V. (2002). Characterization of a chitinase gene from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strain 34S1 and its involvement in biological control. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68(3), 1047-1054. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.3.1047-1054.2002 

Lei, S., Wang, L., Liu, L., Hou, Y., Xu, Y., Liang, M., Gao, J., Li, Q., & Huang, S. (2019). Infection and colonization of pathogenic fungus Fusarium proliferatum in rice spikelet rot disease. Rice Science, 26(1), 60-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2018.08.005 

Liu, W., & Wang, G.-L. (2016). Plant innate immunity in rice: A defense against pathogen infection. National Science Review, 3(3), 295-308. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nww015 

Liu, Z., Shi, L., Yang, S., Lin, Y., Weng, Y., Li, X., Hussain, A., Noman, A., & He, S. (2017). Functional and promoter analysis of chiiv3, a chitinase of pepper plant, in response to phytophthora capsici infection. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 18(8), 1661. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18081661 

Marx, C. J., & Lidstrom, M. E. (2001). Development of improved versatile broad-host-range vectors for use in methylotrophs and other gram-negative bacteria the genbank accession numbers for the sequences reported in this paper are af327711, af327712, af327713, af327714, af327715, af327716, af327717, af327718, af327719 and af327720. Microbiology, 147(8), 2065-2075. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-147-8-2065 

Mouyna, I., Hartl, L., & Latgé, J. P. (2013). β-1,3-glucan modifying enzymes in Aspergillus fumigatus. Front Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2013.00081 

Nalley, L., Tsiboe, F., Durand-morat, A., Shew, A., & Thoma, G. (2016). Economic and environmental impact of rice blast pathogen (Magnaporthe oryzae) alleviation in the United States. PLOS ONE, 11(12), e0167295. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167295 

Römer, P., Recht, S., & Lahaye, T. (2009). A single plant resistance gene promoter engineered to recognize multiple TAL effectors from disparate pathogens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(48), 20526-20531. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908812106 

Schada von borzyskowski, L., Remus-emsermann, M., Weishaupt, R., Vorholt, J. A., & Erb, T. J. (2014). A set of versatile brick vectors and promoters for the assembly, expression, and integration of synthetic operons in Methylobacterium extorquens am1 and other alphaproteobacteria. ACS Synthetic Biology, 4(4), 430-443. https://doi.org/10.1021/sb500221v 

Shahbandeh, M. (2021). Revenue of the global apparel market 2012-2025. Statista.

Tian, S. P., Yao, H. J., Deng, X., Xu, X. B., Qin, G. Z., & Chan, Z. L. (2007). Characterization and expression of β-1,3-Glucanase genes in jujube fruit induced by the microbial biocontrol agent Cryptococcus laurentii. Phytopathology®, 97(3), 260-268. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-97-3-0260 

Ueki, A., Takehara, T., Ishioka, G., Kaku, N., & Ueki, K. (2020). β-1,3-Glucanase production as an anti-fungal enzyme by phylogenetically different strains of the genus Clostridium isolated from anoxic soil that underwent biological disinfestation. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 104, 5563-5578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-10626-8 

Zhang, G., Brokx, S., & Weiner, J. H. (2005). Extracellular accumulation of recombinant proteins fused to the carrier protein yebf in Escherichia coli. Nature Biotechnology, 24(1), 100-104. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1174 

Zubrod, J. P., Bundschuh, M., Arts, G., Brühl, C. A., Imfeld, G., Knäbel, A., Payraudeau, S., Rasmussen, J. J., Rohr, J., Scharmüller, A., Smalling, K., Stehle, S., Schulz, R., & Schäfer, R. B. (2019). Fungicides: An overlooked pesticide class? Environmental Science & Technology, 53(7), 3347-3365. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b04392