Makayla Dunn and Ty Heinlen – Marietta High School, Marietta, Georgia, United States
Reviewed on 4 May 2024; Accepted on 10 June 2024; Published on 26 October 2024
With help from the 2024 BioTreks Production Team.
This paper provides the methods for testing prebiotics on Lactobacillus growth, both individually and in co-culture with Escherichia coli K12. While prior research examines the effects of different prebiotics on the growth of various Lactobacillus species, their effects on Lactobacillus – E. coli concomitantly remain unexplored . Lactobacillus, a gram-positive bacterium, plays a key role in lactose breakdown. Certain strains of Lactobacillus are known for their sugar fermenting properties which can convert lactose to lactic acid instead of gas, thus diminishing some lactose intolerance symptoms . Our paper aims to shed light on the effects of prebiotics on Lactobacillus growth, potentially providing a pathway to discover new strategies for alleviating lactose intolerance symptoms. Additionally, the methods outlined could potentially be used to investigate the ability of Lactobacillus to inhibit E. coli growth under certain conditions. The methodology involves preparing De Man, Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) broths with different prebiotic concentrations, inoculating them with Lactobacillus and E. coli or either alone, and incubating them before plating on MRS Petri dishes though our design does not address the underlying mechanisms of Lactobacillus-E. coli interactions. Some strains of E. coli are beneficial and necessary for a healthy gut. However, the human microbiota is a careful balance between “friendly” or helpful bacteria and harmful bacteria. Future research could investigate these interactions and explore the effects with potentially pathogenic strains of E. coli.
Keywords: Prebiotics, Escherichia coli, Lactobacillus, MRS media
Authors are listed in alphabetical order. Amanda Barret mentored the group. Please direct all correspondence to abarrett@marietta-city.k12.ga.us.
Background
This paper outlines the procedures for creating Lactobacillus – E. coli cocultures in order to test the effects of prebiotics on Lactobacillus growth and its subsequent effects on E. coli. This includes the preparation of De Man, Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) media with modifications to decrease the cost burden. This will allow us in the future to fully investigate the effects of paramylon, a Euglena byproduct, on Lactobacillus – E. coli cocultures.
Prior research examines the effects of different prebiotics on the growth of various Lactobacillus species, however, their effects on Lactobacillus – E. coli concomitantly remain unexplored (Dai et al., 2022). Lactobacillus is a gram-positive bacteria that aids in the breakdown of lactose to lactic acid instead of gas, one of the main symptoms of lactose intolerance. While there have been no human trials, research suggests that the strain L. acidophilus mitigates the symptoms caused by lactose intolerance (Pakadaman et al, 2016). Additionally, research indicates that certain Lactobacillus strains exhibit inhibitory properties towards E. coli. though the mechanisms for this are not understood.
Preparing a modified De Man, Rogosa and Sharpe media
Lactobacillus grows best on De Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe (MRS) media as many strains are auxotrophic. This media can be expensive to purchase premade, as such this section outlines the methods needed to prepare MRS media and can be easily scaled up to decrease associated costs. Other modifications were made to decrease costs following the work of Zhang et. al. (2020). Ammonium citrate, a chelating agent that provides micronutrients to the media was omitted and beef extract was substituted with additional yeast extract, this will provide the media with proteins, minerals, and vitamins but will exclude any creatine and creatinine. Additionally, Tween 80 was substituted for Tween 20 as they are very similar in function, with few differences being solubility, hydrophilicity, and lipophilicity. Finally, sodium acetate was excluded not to decrease cost but due to its function as a suppressant of non-lactic acid-producing bacteria.
Requirements
Time: 45 min
Equipment:
Weigh boat
Scoopula
250 mL beaker
500 mL Erlenmeyer flask
250 mL, 100 mL, 25 mL graduated cylinders
Scale
Autoclave
Materials (Note 1):
10 g peptone
10 g yeast extract
20 g glucose
2 g Potassium phosphate
0.2 g Magnesium sulfate heptahydrate
0.8 g Tween 20
1 L distilled water
Probiotic of choice (ex. 12.5 g Euglena powder)
Procedures
- Weigh out amounts of all materials and place them in a 250 mL graduated cylinder.
- Fill up to 250 mL with distilled water.
- Pour into an Erlenmeyer flask with 750 mL of distilled water and mix well.
- Autoclave at 121oC for 15 min (Note 2).
Preparing Petri dishes and broth
This is necessary to culture the bacteria. The broths will be used to test the effects of the prebiotics while the Petri dishes will allow one to observe the results.
Requirements
Time: 20 min
Equipment:
500 mL Erlenmeyer flasks
three 100 mL Erlenmeyer flasks
18 mL Petri dishes (Note 3)
six 50 mL media bottles (Note 3)
Scale
Scoopula
Thermometer
Hot plate
Materials:
1 L prepared MRS media with
Prebiotic of choice (Note 4)
14 g agar powder
Procedures
Petri dishes
- Remove MRS media from the autoclave.
- Add 14 g of agar powder to 550 mL of MRS media.
- Heat until boiling for 1 min and let cool until 55oC.
- Pour approximately 30 mL into each Petri dish.
- Leave to solidify.
Broth
- Pour 100 mL of MRS media into three flasks.
- Add the desired amount of prebiotic to each flask at varying concentrations.
- Pour 50 mL each into three properly labeled media bottles for a total of six cultures.
Inoculating broths
Requirements
Time: 30 min
Equipment:
Bunsen burner
1 mL metal inoculation loop
Gloves
70% Isopropyl alcohol
Materials:
E. coli K12 culture
Lactobacillus culture (Note 5)
Prepared 50 mL MRS broths
Procedures
- Wipe down the work area with isopropyl alcohol.
- Hold the inoculating loop over the Bunsen burner to sterilize.
- Dip loop into Lactobacillus culture and then into one of the six MRS broths.
- Resterilize the loop and repeat for the other five broths sterilizing the loop between each.
- Sterilize the loop and dip into E. coli culture then dip into one of the broths.
- Resterilize the loop and repeat for the two other broths with different prebiotic concentrations.
- This should leave you with three broths that are E. coli – Lactobacillus co-cultures at different prebiotic concentrations and three broths that are solely Lactobacillus cultures at different prebiotic concentrations.
Plating samples
Plating the samples on Petri dishes allows one to quantify the concentration of bacteria by counting the number of CFUs. This will allow us to determine how the bacteria interacted with each other and the prebiotics.
Requirements
Time: 20 min
Equipment:
Serial pipette
24 test tubes
Materials:
Prepared Petri dishes
Prepared broths
200 mL distilled water
Procedures
- Fill each test tube with 9 mL of distilled water.
- For each broth pipette 1 mL into a test tube (label 1:10).
- Then to continue the serial dilution pipette 1 mL of the 1:10 test tube into a new test tube (label 1:100) and repeat twice more for a dilution of 1:10,000.
- Pipette 1 mL of the 1:100, 1:1,000, and 1:10,000 dilution from each broth onto properly labeled MRS Petri dishes.
- Leave upside down for 48 hours before counting the number of CFUs in each (Note 6).
Safe Disposal
When working with bacteria, it is of utmost importance to properly dispose of all cultures. All bacteria strains cultured were classified as Biosafety Level 1 and adherence to the proper safety measures according to that designation were followed. Biohazardous materials are decontaminated prior to disposal through the use of the autoclave before being placed in a red biohazard-marked bag then disposed of in the solid waste container.
Requirements
Time: 10 min
Equipment:
Large container
Materials:
Bleach
Water
Prepared Petri dishes
Prepared media bottles
Prepared test tubes
Procedures
- Fill a large container with 10% bleach solution.
- Soak Petri dishes, media bottles, and test tubes in solution for 20 min. minimum.
- Rinse and dispose of materials or wash and reuse.
Notes
- Tween 20 can be substituted for Tween 80.
- Media can be left in the autoclave until it is used in subsequent steps to ensure it remains sterile.
- The number of Petri dishes and media bottles listed is dependent on the number of trials and number of concentrations desired. This protocol assumes three trials at three different concentrations.
- Amounts vary based on the chosen prebiotic for the development of this procedure; we used paramylon at concentrations of 1, 5, and 10% (w/v).
- This culture we created ourselves by isolating Lactobacillus strains in Kefir yogurt.
Table 1. Colony counts
Petri dish samples | E. coli | Lactobacillus | Lactobacillus & E. coli |
Pictures | |||
# of Colonies | 9 | 1 | 6 |
Discussions
Our methodology is overall very straightforward. The main drawback comes for the cost of the MRS agar. However, that was minimized through our protocol modifications. It allows one to culture E. coli and Lactobacillus at varying prebiotic concentrations relatively easily. The results of our methodology with paramylon have not yet been fully observed, however the methodology was successful so far.
Next Steps
The next step of our research would be performing the full-scale experiment. However, beyond that investigation of the interactions between Lactobacillus and E. coli would be advisable, particularly addressing the question of how lactic acid produced by Lactobacillus may contribute to E. coli inhibition when euglena prebiotics are present. Additionally, the effects of different prebiotics could be investigated, including isolating specific nutrients such as paramylon, linoleic acid, and carotenoids (Dai et al., 2022). As there are few human test trials, our next research lab can observe the effects of our increased Lactobacillus cultures by adding these probiotics into common food and testing if they have an effect on those who are lactose intolerant.
Author Contributions
T.H. and M.D. developed and executed methods. T.H. and M.D. wrote the abstract, procedures, notes, and discussions. T.H. wrote the background, next steps, and acknowledgments. M.D. created the video and provided a table with the results.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank our mentor and teacher Amanda Barrett for introducing us to this opportunity and guiding us through the development of our manuscript. Without her, we would have never gotten the opportunity to do this. We would also like to thank Dr. Benjamin Steil of Arbor Biosciences for his assistance during the beginning of this project.
Additionally, we would like to thank the BioBuilder Educational Foundation. This project was developed through their program and through their generosity we were able to submit our manuscript
References
Baureder, M., & Hederstedt, L. (2013). HEMe proteins in lactic acid bacteria. In Advances in Microbial Physiology, 62, 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-410515-7.00001-9
Dai, J., He, J., Chen, Z., Qin, H., Du, M., Lei, A., Zhao, L., & Wang, J. (2022). Euglena gracilis Promotes Lactobacillus Growth and Antioxidants Accumulation as a Potential Next-Generation Prebiotic. Frontiers in Nutrition, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.864565
Mizuno, K., Mizuno, M., Yamauchi, M., Takemura, A. J., Romero, V. M., & Morikawa, K. (2017). Adjacent-possible ecological niche: growth of Lactobacillus species co-cultured with Escherichia coli in a synthetic minimal medium. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 12880. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12894-3
Pakdaman, M. N., Udani, J. K., Molina, J. P., & Shahani, M. (2015). The effects of the DDS-1 strain of lactobacillus on symptomatic relief for lactose intolerance – a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover clinical trial. Nutrition Journal, 15(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-016-0172-y
Zhang, J., Bu, Y., Zhang, C., Yi, H., Liu, D., & Jiao, J. (2020). Development of a Low-Cost and High-Efficiency Culture Medium for Bacteriocin Lac-B23 Production by Lactobacillus plantarum J23. Biology, 9(7), 171. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology9070171